DSpace Home
→
Електронні публікації
→
Фізико-математичний факультет
→
Кафедра інформатики та прикладної математики
→
View Item

Teaching logic programming: a review

Семеріков, Сергій Олексійович; Мінтій, Ірина Сергіївна; Моісеєнко, Наталя Володимирівна

URI: http://elibrary.kdpu.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/12019
https://doi.org/10.55056/cte.838

Date: 2025

Abstract:

Logic programming constitutes a significant paradigm within computerscience, offering a unique approach to programming based on formal logic ratherthan conventional imperative instructions. This review examines contemporarymethodologies for teaching logic programming, spanning various paradigms in-cluding Prolog, Answer Set Programming (ASP), Datalog, and Constraint LogicProgramming (CLP). Through a comprehensive analysis of literature, we identifyeffective pedagogical strategies, common obstacles faced by educators and students,and emerging trends in instructional techniques. Our findings reveal that visualiza-tion tools, problem-based learning, integration with other programming paradigms,and contextual application-based approaches demonstrate the most promise forenhancing student comprehension and engagement. Additionally, we explore cog-nitive challenges specific to declarative thinking, educational challenges relatedto curriculum integration, and motivational issues that affect student learningoutcomes. This review offers evidence-based recommendations for practitioners andidentifies promising directions for future research in logic programming education.

Description:

[1]Adachi, Y., 2008. Prolog visualization system using Logichart diagrams.18thWorkshop on Logic-based methods in Programming Environments, WLPE 2008.pp.8–18. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.2207.[2]Anderson, D.M., 2013. Overarching Goals, Values, and Assumptions of Inte-grated Curriculum Design.SCHOLE: A Journal of Leisure Studies and RecreationEducation, 28(1), pp.1–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/1937156X.2013.11949690.[3]Apt, K.R. and Wallace, M., 2006.Constraint logic programming using ECLiPSe.Cambridge University Press.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220693610, Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607400.[4]Awasekar, D.D., 2013. Effect of Program Visualization to Teach Computer Pro-gramming in a Resource Constrained Classroom.2013 IEEE Fifth InternationalConference on Technology for Education (t4e 2013). pp.93–100. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2013.31.[5]B ̆adic ̆a, A., B ̆adic ̆a, C. and Ivanovi ́c, M., 2020. Block structured scheduling usingconstraint logic programming.AI Communications, 33(1), pp.41–57. Availablefrom: https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-200650. [6]Bellström, P. and Thorén, C., 2009. Learning how to program through visualiza-tion: A pilot study on the bubble sort algorithm.2nd International Conferenceon the Applications of Digital Information and Web Technologies, ICADIWT 2009.pp.90–94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICADIWT.2009.5273943.[7]Bertagnon, A. and Gavanelli, M., 2024. ASPECT: Answer Set rePresentation asvEctor graphiCs in laTex.Journal of Logic and Computation, 34(8), pp.1580–1607.Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/LOGCOM/EXAE042.[8]Boluk, K.A., 2023. Integrated Curriculum Design: An Empowering and EngagingPedagogical Approach Preparing 21st Graduates.SCHOLE: A Journal of LeisureStudies and Recreation Education, 38(3), pp.224–229. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/1937156X.2022.2099326.[9]Choo, S.S.Y., 2012. Scaffolding in Problem-based Learning. In: G. O’Grady, E.H.Yew, K.P. Goh and H.G. Schmidt, eds.One-Day, One-Problem: An Approach toProblem-based Learning. Singapore: Springer Singapore, pp.167–184. Availablefrom: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-75-3_8.[10]Cuteri, B. and Ricca, F., 2017. A compiler for stratified datalog programs: prelim-inary results. In: S. Flesca, S. Greco, E. Masciari and D. Saccà, eds.Proceedingsof the 25th Italian Symposium on Advanced Database Systems, Squillace Lido(Catanzaro), Italy, June 25-29, 2017. CEUR-WS.org,CEUR Workshop Proceedings,vol. 2037, p.158. Available from: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2037/paper_23.pdf.[11]Dal Palù, A., Dovier, A., Fogolari, F. and Pontelli, E., 2011. Exploring proteinfragment assembly using CLP.Proceedings of the Twenty-Second InternationalJoint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume Three. AAAI Press,IJCAI’11, p.2590–2595. Available from: https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/11/Papers/431.pdf.[12]del Vado Vírseda, R. and Morente, F.P., 2011. An Innovative Teaching Tool basedon Semantic Tableaux for Verification and Debugging of Imperative Programs.Procedia Computer Science, 4, pp.1907–1916. Proceedings of the InternationalConference on Computational Science, ICCS 2011. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2011.04.208.[13]Dewey, K., Conrad, P., Craig, M. and Morozova, E., 2017. Evaluating TestSuite Effectiveness and Assessing Student Code via Constraint Logic Program-ming.Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technologyin Computer Science Education. New York, NY, USA: Association for ComputingMachinery, ITiCSE ’17, p.317–322. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/3059009.3059051.[14]El-Khatib, O., Pontelli, E. and Son, T.C., 2006. A Tool for Knowledge BaseIntegration and Querying.Formalizing and Compiling Background Knowledge andIts Applications to Knowledge Representation and Question Answering, Papers fromthe 2006 AAAI Spring Symposium, Technical Report SS-06-05, Stanford, California,USA, March 27-29, 2006. AAAI, pp.16–21. Available from: http://www.aaai.org/Library/Symposia/Spring/2006/ss06-05-003.php.[15]Eppler, M.J., 2006. A Comparison between Concept Maps, Mind Maps, Concep-tual Diagrams, and Visual Metaphors as Complementary Tools for KnowledgeConstruction and Sharing.Information Visualization, 5(3), pp.202–210. Availablefrom: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500131.[16]Fages, F., 2024. On Teaching Constraint-based Modeling and Algorithms forDecision Support in Prolog. In: J. Arias, D. Azzolini, K. Basu, V. Dahl, M. Hecher,F. Pacenza, Z.G. Saribatur and S.C. Varanasi, eds.Workshop Proceedings of the40th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP-WS 2024) co-located withthe 40th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2024), Dallas, TX,USA, October 12th and 13th, 2024. CEUR-WS.org,CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 3799. Available from: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3799/short7PEG2.0.pdf.[17]Gavanelli, M. and Rossi, F., 2010. Constraint Logic Programming. In: A. Dovierand E. Pontelli, eds.A 25-Year Perspective on Logic Programming: Achievements ofthe Italian Association for Logic Programming, GULP. Berlin, Heidelberg: SpringerBerlin Heidelberg,Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6125, pp.64–86. Avail-able from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14309-0_4.[18]Gebser, M., Obermeier, P., Otto, T., Schaub, T., Sabuncu, O., Nguyen, V. andSon, T.C., 2018. Experimenting with robotic intra-logistics domains.Theoryand Practice of Logic Programming, 18(3-4), pp.502–519. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068418000200.[19]Gelfond, G., Balduccini, M., Ferrucci, D., Kalyanpur, A. and Lally, A., 2023.Machines as Thought Partners: Reflections on 50 Years of Prolog. In: D.S.Warren, V. Dahl, T. Eiter, M.V. Hermenegildo, R. Kowalski and F. Rossi, eds.Prolog: The Next 50 Years. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland,Lecture Notes inComputer Science, vol. 13900, pp.386–392. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35254-6_31.[20]Genesereth, M.R., 2024. General Game Playing - Killer App for Logic Program-ming. In: J. Arias, D. Azzolini, K. Basu, V. Dahl, M. Hecher, F. Pacenza, Z.G.Saribatur and S.C. Varanasi, eds.Workshop Proceedings of the 40th InternationalConference on Logic Programming (ICLP-WS 2024) co-located with the 40th Interna-tional Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2024), Dallas, TX, USA, October 12thand 13th, 2024. CEUR-WS.org,CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 3799. Availablefrom: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3799/short3PEG2.0.pdf.[21]Hansen, Z., Du, H., Xing, W., Eckel, R., Lugo, J. and Zhang, Y., 2022. A Pre-liminary Data-driven Analysis of Common Errors Encountered by Novice SPARCProgrammers. In: Y. Lierler, J.F. Morales, C. Dodaro, V. Dahl, M. Gebser andK.T. Tekle, eds.Proceedings 38th International Conference on Logic Program-ming, ICLP 2022 Technical Communications / Doctoral Consortium, Haifa, Israel,31st July 2022 - 6th August 2022.EPTCS, vol. 364, pp.12–24. Available from:https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.364.2.[22]Hanus, M., 2007. Multi-paradigm Declarative Languages. In: V. Dahl andI. Niemelä, eds.Logic Programming. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg,Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4670 LNCS, pp.45–75. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74610-2_5.[23]Hanus, M., 2013. Functional Logic Programming: From Theory to Curry. In:A. Voronkov and C. Weidenbach, eds.Programming Logics: Essays in Memory ofHarald Ganzinger. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg,Lecture Notesin Computer Science, vol. 7797, pp.123–168. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37651-1_6.[24]Harimurti, R., Ekohariadi, Munoto and Asto Buditjahjanto, I.G.P., 2021. Integrat-ing k-means clustering into automatic programming assessment tool for studentperformance analysis.Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and ComputerScience, 22(3), pp.1389–1395. Available from: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v22.i3.pp1389-1395.[25]Hynek, J., 2018. The Role of Logic Programming in ICT Specialists Curricula.2018 28th EAEEIE Annual Conference (EAEEIE). pp.1–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/EAEEIE.2018.8534297.[26]Ibarra-Torres, F., Caiza, G., García, M.V. and Barona-Pico, V., 2024. Use ofbasic programming tools to foster programming logic in university students withschool preparation other than computer science.Procedia Computer Science,237, pp.413–419. International Conference on Industry Sciences and ComputerScience Innovation. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.05. 122. [27] Jones, N.D., Azzam, T., Wanzer, D.L., Skousen, D., Knight, C. and Sabarre, N., 2020. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Logic Models. American Journal of Evaluation, 41(3), pp.452–470. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1098214018824417. [28] Kerdprasop, N. and Kerdprasop, K., 2011. Frequent pattern discovery with constraint logic programming. International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 5(8), pp.1345–1353. Available from: https: //www.researchgate.net/publication/286164687. [29] Kheirkhahzadeh, A.D., Sauer, C.S. and Fotaris, P., 2016. Practice makes perfect - Gamification of a competitive learning experience. Proceedings of the European Conference on Games-based Learning. pp.327–335. Available from: https://www. researchgate.net/publication/309034354. [30] Körner, P., Schneider, D. and Leuschel, M., 2021. On the Performance of Bytecode Interpreters in Prolog. In: M. Hanus and C. Sacerdoti Coen, eds. Functional and Constraint Logic Programming. Cham: Springer International Publishing, vol. 12560, pp.41–56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75333-7_ 3. [31] Kowalski, R., 2013. Logic Programming in the 1970s. In: P. Cabalar and T.C. Son, eds. Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8148, pp.11– 22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40564-8_2. [32] Krugel, J. and Hubwieser, P., 2020. Web-Based Learning in Computer Science: Insights into Progress and Problems of Learners in MOOCs. In: M. Giannakos, ed. Non-Formal and Informal Science Learning in the ICT Era. Singapore: Springer Singapore, Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, pp.51–79. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6747-6_4. [33] Lape, N.K., 2011. Tiered scaffolding of Problem-Based Learning techniques in a Thermodynamics course. 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Vancouver, BC: ASEE Conferences. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--18365. [34] Le, N.T., 2005. Evaluation of a Constraint-based Error Diagnosis System for Logic Programming. Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Towards Sustainable and Scalable Educational Innovations Informed by the Learning Sciences: Sharing Good Practices of Research, Experimentation and Innovation. NLD: IOS Press, p.965–966. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221319184. [35] Ligeza, A., 2006. Logic Programming and Prolog. Logical Foundations for RuleBased Systems. 2nd ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 11, pp.173–188. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1007/3-540-32446-1_11. [36] Loboda, T.D. and Brusilovsky, P., 2010. User-adaptive explanatory program visualization: evaluation and insights from eye movements. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 20(3), pp.191–226. Available from: https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11257-010-9077-1. [37] Lovrencic, S. and Sekovanic, V., 2023. How Well Students Perceive Their Understanding of Logic Programming Course Content? In: D. Cisic, N. Vrcek, M. Koricic, V. Gradisnik, K. Skala, Z. Car, M. Cicin-Sain, S. Babic, V. Sruk, D. Skvorc, A. Jovic, S. Gros, B. Vrdoljak, E. Tijan, T. Katulic, J. Petrovic, T.G. Grbac and L. Bozicevic, eds. 46th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention, MIPRO 2023, Opatija, Croatia, May 22-26, 2023. IEEE, pp.824–828. Available from: https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO57284.2023.10159945. [38] Malandrino, D., Guarino, A., Lettieri, N. and Zaccagnino, R., 2019. On the Visualization of Logic: A Diagrammatic Language Based on Spatial, Graphical and Symbolic Notations. In: E. Banissi, A. Ursyn, M.W.M. Bannatyne, N. Datia, R. Francese, M. Sarfraz, T.G. Wyeld, F. Bouali, G. Venturini, H. Azzag, M. Lebbah, M. Trutschl, U. Cvek, H. Müller, M. Nakayama, S. Kernbach, L. Caruccio, M. Risi, U. Erra, A. Vitiello and V. Rossano, eds. 23rd International Conference on Information Visualisation, IV 2019, Paris, France, July 2-5, 2019, Part I. IEEE, pp.7–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2019.00011. [39] Marcopoulos, E. and Zhang, Y., 2019. onlineSPARC: A Programming Environment for Answer Set Programming. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 19(2), pp.262–289. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068418000509. [40] Miranda Júnior, A., Oliveira, O.C. and Mistris, A., 2018. CeTeCop - Conceptual framework collaborative for learning development and programming. In: P. Isaías and H. Weghorn, eds. Proceedings of the International Conferences on WWW/Internet 2018 and Applied Computing 2018. pp.59–66. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/4tkd9rdm. [41] Msweli, N.T., Mawela, T. and Twinomurinzi, H., 2023. Transdisciplinary teaching practices for data science education: A comprehensive framework for integrating disciplines. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), p.100628. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100628. [42] Nipyrakis, A. and Stavrou, D., 2022. Integration of ICT in Science Education Laboratories by Primary Student Teachers. In: S. Papadakis and M. Kalogiannakis, eds. STEM, Robotics, Mobile Apps in Early Childhood and Primary Education: Technology to Promote Teaching and Learning. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, pp.55–78. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0568-1_4. [43] Oprea, M., 2019. Onto-DeclarProg: An Educational Ontology for Declarative Programming. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference On Virtual Learning. Bucharest University Press, pp.37–43. Available from: https://icvl.eu/documents/3/ 430216179-Proceedings-of-ICVL-2019-ISSN-1844-8933-ISI-Proceedings.pdf. [44] Page, R., 2009. Computational logic in the undergraduate curriculum. Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on the ACL2 Theorem Prover and Its Applications. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, ACL2 ’09, p.29–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/1637837.1637842. [45] Paramonov, S., Bessiere, C., Dries, A. and Raedt, L.D., 2018. Sketched Answer Set Programming. In: L.H. Tsoukalas, É. Grégoire and M. Alamaniotis, eds. IEEE 30th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI 2018, 5-7 November 2018, Volos, Greece. IEEE, pp.694–701. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2018.00110. [46] Pereira, D.E.F. and Seabra, R.D., 2023. Open Educational Resource for Studying Algorithms and Programming Logic: An Approach to the Technical Level Integrated with Secondary School. Informatics in Education, 22(3), pp.441–462. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2023.17. [47] Perez-Lancho, B., Jorge, E., Viuda, A. de la and Sanchez, R., 2007. Software Tools in Logic Education: Some Examples. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 15(4), pp.347–357. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzm025. [48] Ragonis, N. and Haberman, B., 2010. Linking different programming paradigms: thoughts about instructional design. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, ITiCSE ’10, p.310. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/1822090.1822187. [49] Rajesh, S., Rao, V.V. and Thushara, M.G., 2024. Comprehensive Investigation of Code Assessment Tools in Programming Courses. 2024 IEEE 9th International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT). pp.1–6. Available from: https: //doi.org/10.1109/I2CT61223.2024.10543863. [50] Rodríguez, J.P. and Cecchi, L.A., 2024. Logic Programming in Primary School: Facing Computer Science at an Early Age. L Latin American Computer Conference, CLEI 2024, Buenos Aires, Argentina, August 12-16, 2024. IEEE, pp.1–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI64178.2024.10700103. [51] Sáenz-Pérez, F., 2011. DES: A Deductive Database System. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 271, pp.63–78. Proceedings of the Tenth Spanish Conference on Programming and Languages (PROLE 2010). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2011.02.011. [52] Schaub, T. and Woltran, S., 2018. Answer set programming unleashed! KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 32(2), pp.105–108. Available from: https://doi.org/10. 1007/s13218-018-0550-z. [53] Sharma, R., Shen, H. and Goodwin, R., 2016. Voluntary participation in discussion forums as an engagement indicator: an empirical study of teaching first-year programming. Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, OzCHI ’16, p.489–493. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3010967. [54] Skvortsov, E.S., Xia, Y., Bowers, S. and Ludäscher, B., 2024. From Logic Programming to Programming in Logica: A First-Course in Declarative Data Science & Engineering. In: J. Arias, D. Azzolini, K. Basu, V. Dahl, M. Hecher, F. Pacenza, Z.G. Saribatur and S.C. Varanasi, eds. Workshop Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP-WS 2024) co-located with the 40th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2024), Dallas, TX, USA, October 12th and 13th, 2024. CEUR-WS.org, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 3799. Available from: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3799/paper6PEG2.0.pdf. [55] Souza, S.M. and Bittencourt, R.A., 2019. Motivation and Engagement with PBL in an Introductory Programming Course. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2019, Cincinnati, OH, USA, October 16-19, 2019. IEEE, pp.1–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028419. [56] Szeredi, P., 2004. Teaching Constraints through Logic Puzzles. In: K.R. Apt, F. Fages, F. Rossi, P. Szeredi and J. Váncza, eds. Recent Advances in Constraints. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3010, pp.196–222. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-540-24662-6_11. [57] Tiantong, M. and Teemuangsai, S., 2013. The Four Scaffolding Modules for Collaborative Problem-Based Learning through the Computer Network on Moodle LMS for the Computer Programming Course. International Education Studies, 6(5), pp.47–55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n5p47. [58] Tran, V.D., Kato, H. and Hu, Z., 2020. A Counterexample-Guided Debugger for Non-recursive Datalog. In: B.C.d.S. Oliveira, ed. Programming Languages and Systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12470, pp.323–342. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-030-64437-6_17. [59] Villadsen, J. and Jacobsen, F.K., 2021. Using Isabelle in Two Courses on Logic and Automated Reasoning. In: J.F. Ferreira, A. Mendes and C. Menghi, eds. Formal Methods Teaching. Cham: Springer International Publishing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 13122 LNCS, pp.117–132. https://backend. orbit.dtu.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/266397070/FMTea.pdf, Available from: https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91550-6_9. [60] Vosinakis, S., Anastassakis, G. and Koutsabasis, P., 2018. Teaching and learning logic programming in virtual worlds using interactive microworld representations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), pp.30–44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309733522, Available from: https: //doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12531. [61] Vosinakis, S., Koutsabasis, P. and Anastassakis, G., 2014. A Platform for Teaching Logic Programming Using Virtual Worlds. IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2014, Athens, Greece, July 7-10, 2014. IEEE Computer Society, pp.657–661. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ ICALT.2014.193. [62] Wang, T., Liu, J.C. and Li, T., 2019. Design Variables for Self-Directed Learning in MOOC Environment. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 12(1), pp.59–78. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.1201. 04. [63] Wick, M.R. and Stevenson, D.E., 2006. On using Scheme to introduce Prolog. In: D. Baldwin, P.T. Tymann, S.M. Haller and I. Russell, eds. Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2006, Houston, Texas, USA, March 3-5, 2006. ACM, pp.41–45. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/1121341.1121356. [64] Wu, C.P. and Lo, P.H., 2013. The design principles of the worked examples. Workshop Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2013. pp.192–195. Available from: https://library.apsce.net/index.php/ ICCE/article/view/2951. [65] Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Bolduc, F., Murray, W.G. and Staffen, W., 2019. A Preliminary Report of Integrating Science and Computing Teaching Using Logic Programming. The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2019, The Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2019, The Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2019, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, January 27 - February 1, 2019. AAAI Press, pp.9737–9744. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1609/AAAI.V33I01.33019737. [66] Zhu, M. and Bonk, C.J., 2022. Guidelines and strategies for fostering and enhancing self-directed online learning. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513. 2022.2141105.

Show full item record