dc.contributor.author	Кисельов, Владислав Аленович
dc.date.accessioned	2024-12-22T18:46:12Z
dc.date.available	2024-12-22T18:46:12Z
dc.date.issued	2024-11-29
dc.identifier.citation	Кисельов В. А. Формування ключових компетентностей здобувачів базової середньої освіти в процесі вивчення англійської мови : кваліфікаційна робота / наук. керівник – кандидат педагогічних наук, доцент кафедри англійської філології І. С. Зоренко. Кривий Ріг : КДПУ, 2024. 72 с. Робота захищена з оцінкою "добре" С 75. Дата захисту 14.12.24
dc.identifier.uri	http://elibrary.kdpu.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/11213
dc.description	1. Коста Дж., Вільямс М. Англійська мова (6-й рік навчання) : підручник для 6 класів закладів загальної середньої освіти (з аудіосупроводом). К. : Лінгвіст, 2023. 160 с 2. Лісова О. В. Modeling the Competency-Based Approach to Foreign Language Teaching in Schools. Pedagogical Education Theory and Practice. 2017, Vol. 8, pp.24-28. 3. Редько В., Полонська Т. Компетентнісно орієнтоване навчання іноземних мов учнів 5-6 класів гімназій: прогностичні концепти. Укранський педагогічний журнал, 2020. DOI: 10.32405/2411-1317-2020-1-41-50. 4. Anderson T. The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca, Alberta : Athabasca University Press, 2016 436 p. 5. Anderson T., Simpson M. Educational technology platforms: What are universities' strategic investments? EDUCAUSE Review, 2017. Vol. 52(2), pp.58-68. 6. Barrett B. Instructed pragmatics in the second language classroom: The role of context. London : Routledge, 2006. 354 p. 7. Bates A. W. Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning. Vancouver : BCcampus. 2015. 463 p. 8. Boahin P. Competency-based curriculum: A framework for bridging the gap in teaching, assessment and the world of work International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education Research, 2018. Vol. 4(2). pp.1-15. 9. Bozkurt A., Sharma R. C. Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to the CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 2020. Vol. 15(1), pp.1-6. 10. Brunello G., Schlotter M. Non-cognitive skills and personality traits : Labour market relevance and their development in education and training systems. Bonn : The Institute for the study of labour (IZA), 2011. 173 p. 11. Canale M. From Communicative Competence to Communicative Language Pedagogy. In J. C. Richard, & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication. London : Longman, 1983. pp. 2-14. 12. Canale, M., Swain, M. Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, 1980. Vol. 1(1), pp. 1-47. 13. Chomsky N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts : The M.I.T. Press, 1965. 261 p. 14. Csapó B. Knowledge and Competencies. In Jos Letschert (ed.): The Integrated Person – How curriculum development relates to new competencies. Enschede : CIDREE., 2004. pp. 45–46. 15. De Oliveira M.R., Sant’Anna I.B., Ramos G.S. Open Educational Resources Platform Based on Collective Intelligence. In Proceedings of the IEEE 4th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 18–20 October 2018, pp. 346–353. 16. DeSeCo The definition and selection of key competencies. Executive Summary. 2005. URL: https://one.oecd.org/document/EDU/EDPC /ECEC/RD(2010)26/en/pdf (дата звернення 12.05.2024). 17. Docking R. Competency-based curricula – the big picture. Prospect, 1994. Vol. 9(2). pp.11–15. 18. Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata. IEEE Standard 1484.12.1; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers : New York, NY, USA, 2010. 19. Estebán S.G. Do Video Learning Objects Develop Digital Competence in Teacher Training? Rev. Electrónica Lingüística Apl. 2017, Vol. 16, pp.85–102. 20. Freebody P., Muspratt S. McRae D. Evaluating The Le@rning Federation’s online curriculum content initiative. Melbourne : The Le@rning Federation. 2007. URL: http://www.thelearningfederation.edu.au/ verve/_resources/freebody_final_report_2007.pdf (дата звернення 02.06.2024). 21. Godwin-Jones R. Using mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 2018. Vol. 22(2), pp.5-11. 22. Goh C.C., Burns A. Teaching Speaking: A Holistic Approach. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 2012. 436 p. 23. Gonzalez G.T., Estrada F.J. How teachers design and implement instructional materials to improve classroom practice. Intangible Capital, 2017. Vol. 13(5). pp. 971-1050. 24. Griffin P. Assessment for Teaching. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2017. 267 p. 25. Guskey T. R. Mapping the Road to Proficiency. Educational Leadership, 2005. Vol. 63 (3), pp. 32-38 26. Hartoyo E., Pratiwi W. A. Investigating the effects of online English language learning on students' motivation. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 2020. Vol. 1(1), pp.27-38. 27. Hinkel E. Current Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar. TESOL Quarterly, 2006. Vol. 7, pp.46-49. 28. Hwang W.S., Kim H.S. Does the adoption of emerging technologies improve technical efficiency? Evidence from Korean manufacturing SMEs. Business Economics, 2022. Vol. 59(1). pp.1-17. 29. Jack-Richards C. Communicative language teaching, New York, USA, 2006. 46 p. 30. Kayi H. Teaching Speaking: Activities to Promote Speaking in a Second Language. The Internet TESL Journal. 2006. Vol.12. URL: http://iteslj.org/ Techniques/Kayi-TeachingSpeaking.html (дата звернення 25.10.2024). 31. Khrystych N. Educational Websites as a Means of Forming the Communicative Competency of High School Students in the Course of Studying the Subject “The English Language”. Professional Education: methodology, theory and technologies. 2023. Vol. 17. Pp.203-227. 32. Khrystych N. S., Borysova N. V. The problem of choice of traditional and innovative teaching technologies in the process of formation of future English teachers. Scientific notes of the National University «Ostroh Academy»: series «Philology», 2022. Vol. 13 (81), pp.198- 201. 33. Khrystych N. S., Skliarenko O. B. Pedagogical conditions for the formation of communicative competences of future teachers of foreign languages. Scientific collection «Actual issues of humanitarian sciences», 2020. pp.240-250. 34. Knapp M., Risha Z., Gatewood, R. Learning to Love the LOR: Implementing an Internal Learning Object Repository at a Large National Organization. Med. Ref. Serv. Q. 2019, Vol. 38, pp.143–155. 35. Knecht P., Janík T., Najvar P., Najvarová V., Vlčková K. Opportunities for problem solving competency development at grammar schools. Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic study. Orbis scholae, 2010. Vol. 4(3), pp.37-62. 36. Kuchai O., Kuchai T., Pyrzyk I. Studying the peculiarities of education development in Japan (in terms of primary education). Science and Education, 2017. Vol. 25 (5). pp.46-54. 37. Larsen-Freeman D. and Anderson M., Techniques & Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford : Oxford University, 2011. 318 p. 38. Leach L. The Role of Authentic Materials in Language Teaching. TESOL Journal, 2000. Vol. 9(2), pp. 29-35. 39. Lee K., Kim H. The Instructional Strategies of Competency-Based Curriculum: The Role of Teachers. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2018. Vol. 118(19). pp.1237-1252. 40. Lyu B., Lai C. Learners’ engagement on a social networking platform: An ecological analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 2022. Vol. 26(1), pp.1–22. 41. M. D. Roblyer, Oare Dozier-Henry and Ada P. Burnette. Technology and Multicultural Education: The 'Uneasy Alliance'. Educational Technology. 1996. Vol. 36, pp. 5-12. 42. Mejia M. Leveraging Technology to Develop Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2023. Vol. 51(2). DOI:10.1177/00472395231166613. 43. Mrowicki L. Preparing for Life: Competencies in Education. Portland, Oreg.: Northwest Educational Cooperative, 1986. 469 p. 44. Mulder M. Competence-based Education and Training. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 2012. Vol. 18(3), pp. 305–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2012.670048. 45. Murwa V., Yun H., Kim Y.S. The role of gamification in education - a literature review. Contemporary Engineering Sciences, 2014. Vol. 7(29). pp.1609-1616. 46. Nunan D. Task-Based Language Teaching. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2004. 436 p. 47. Papastergiou M., Mastrogiannis I. Design, development and evaluation of open interactive learning objects for secondary school physical education. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2021, Vol. 26, pp.2981–3007. 48. Reef J.-P. New Assessment Tools for Cross-Curricular Competencies in the Domain of Problem-Solving. Final Report of a project ERB-SOE2-CT98-2042. Luxembourg : European Commission. 49. Reef J.-P., Zabal A. Blech Ch. The Assessment of Problem-Solving Competencies : A draft version of a general framework. 2006. URL: http://www.diebonn.de/esprid/dokumente/doc-2006/reef06_01.pd (дата звернення 26.05.2024). 50. Renandya W.A., Widodo H.P. English Language Teaching Today: Linking Theory and Practice. Switzerland : Springer International Publishing. 2016. 322 p. 51. Richards J. C., Rodgers T. S. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2001. 270 p. 52. Romanovskiy O. Competence-based approach in education: essence and methods of implementation in the educational process. Performanțe într-o economie competitivă, 2020. Vol. 7, pp. 73-81. 53. Romero E.D., Bobkina J. Exploring the perceived benefits and drawbacks of using multimodal learning objects in pre-service English teacher inverted instruction. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2021, Vol. 26, pp.2961–2980. 54. Savage L. Literacy through a Competency-Based Educational Approach. Special-Topic Issue: Adult Literacies, 1993. Vol. 27, No. 3, pp.514-520. 55. Savignon S. J. Communicative Language Teaching: Linguistic Theory and Classroom Practice. London : Yale University Press, 2002. 436 p. 56. Schneck E. A. A Guide to Identifying High School Graduation Competencies. Portland. Oreg. : Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, 1978. 354 p. 57. Schneck E. F. Competency-Based Education: Where Do We Go from Here?.London : Routledge, 1978. 361 p. 58. Seezink A., Poell R.F., Kirschner P.A. Teachers’ individual action theories about competence-based education: The value of the cognitive apprenticeship model. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 2009. Vol. 61. pp.203-215. 59. Simpioni M. R., Ostemberg E., Kohls dos Santos P. As tecnologias digitais na educação e nos processos educativos durante a pandemia do COVID 19: Relatos de professores. Educação Por Escrito, 2020. Vol. 11 (2), pp.38-59. 60. Švec V. Klíčové dovednosti ve vyučování a výcviku. Brno : Masarykova univerzita. 1998, 246 p. 61. Teo T. Pre-service teachers' attitudes towards computer use: A Singapore survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2006. Vol. 22(4), pp.511-530. 62. Tribus A C. The communicative functions of language: An exploration of Roman Jakobson’s theory in TESOL. MA TESOL Collection. 2017, Vol. 723. URL: http://digitalcollections.sit.edu/ipp_collection/723 (дата звернення 09.10.2024). 63. Tuning Educational structures in Europe - European Higher Education Area and Bologna Process. Bologna Process. URL: https://ehea.info/ cid101886/tuning-educational-structures-europe.html (дата звернення 20.05.2024). 64. Warschauer M. Technology and social inclusion : Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge : The MIT Press. 2003. 423 p. 65. Weddel M. Competency-Based Education: A Guide for Educators. London : Routledge. 2006. 457 p. 66. Weinert F. E. Concept of Competence: A Conceptual Clarification. In D. S. Rychen, & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and Selecting Key Competencies. Seattle, WA : Hogrefe and Huber Publishers, 2001. pp.45-65. 67. Westera W. Competences in education: a confusion of tongues. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2001. Vol. 33(1), pp.75-88. 68. Wiley D. Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. Learning Technology, 2000. V.2830, pp. 1-35. 69. Wong R. Competency-based English language teaching and learning: Investigating pre-service teachers of Chinese's learning experiences. Porta Linguarum, 2008. Vol. 9, pp.179-198.	uk
dc.description.abstract	У роботі досліджується впровадження компетентнісно орієнтованого підходу в навчання англійської мови, що сприяє розвитку ключових компетентностей у здобувачів освіти. Розглянуто використання сучасних методик і інноваційних технологій, які допомагають формувати мовленнєві навички, критичне мислення, креативність та здатність до співпраці. Результати дослідження можуть бути застосовані для вдосконалення методичної підготовки педагогів і розробки навчальних матеріалів.	uk
dc.language.iso	uk	uk
dc.subject	компетентність	uk
dc.subject	ключова компетентність	uk
dc.subject	інноваційні технології	uk
dc.subject	здобувачі базової середньої освіти	uk
dc.subject	формування ключових компетентностей	uk
dc.title	Формування ключових компетентностей здобувачів базової середньої освіти в процесі вивчення англійської мови	uk
dc.type	Learning Object	uk