dc.contributor.author |
Kozachenko, Nadiia |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Козаченко, Надія Павлівна |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-08-11T09:02:04Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-08-11T09:02:04Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2022-04-23 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Kozachenko N. Artificial relevance as a way to strengthen an argument : presentation. Logic4Peace, 23 April 2022. |
uk |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://elibrary.kdpu.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/6686 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/6686 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The justification chains supporting the argument descend to beliefs that were not explicated at the start of the argumentation. They are present in the agent`s view, but they are not spoken out and are sometimes not realized. These additional beliefs are not explicitly relevant to the thesis of the argument, but they are taken out of necessity, in the process of argument mining. |
uk |
dc.language.iso |
en |
uk |
dc.publisher |
Department of Philosophy |
uk |
dc.subject |
logic |
uk |
dc.subject |
argumentation theory |
uk |
dc.subject |
critical thinking |
uk |
dc.subject |
strong argument |
uk |
dc.subject |
common reasoning |
uk |
dc.subject |
artificial relevance |
uk |
dc.title |
Artificial relevance as a way to strengthen an argument : presentation |
uk |
dc.type |
Presentation |
uk |