dc.contributor.author |
Kozachenko, Nadiia |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Козаченко, Надія Павлівна |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-08-11T08:59:46Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-08-11T08:59:46Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2022-04-23 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Kozachenko N. Artificial relevance as a way to strengthen an argument. Logic4Peace, 2022, pp. 59-61. |
uk |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://elibrary.kdpu.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/6685 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/6685 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Some of the subjective reactions of an argumentation agent are determined not so much by his emotional or personal characteristics, but by the presence of implicit components of the agent's epistemic state, which can be explicated and formalized. The identification of these components makes it possible to use them to refine the argumentation strategy. |
uk |
dc.language.iso |
en |
uk |
dc.publisher |
The Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, Universiteit van Amsterdam |
uk |
dc.subject |
logic |
uk |
dc.subject |
argumentation theory |
uk |
dc.subject |
critical thinking |
uk |
dc.subject |
strong argument |
uk |
dc.subject |
common reasoning |
uk |
dc.subject |
artificial relevance |
uk |
dc.title |
Artificial relevance as a way to strengthen an argument |
uk |
dc.type |
Article |
uk |