Description:
K. Peyton and S. Unnikrishnan, “A comparison of chatbot platforms with the state-of-the-art sentence BERT for answering online student FAQs,” Results in Engineering, vol. 17, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100856.
V. Gadiraju, S. Kane, S. Dev, A. Taylor, D. Wang, E. Denton, and R. Brewer, ““I wouldn’t say offensive but...”: Disability-Centered Perspectives on Large Language Models,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, ser. FAccT ‘23. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, p. 205–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3593989.
N. S. Patil, R. S. Huang, C. B. van der Pol, and N. Larocque, “Comparative Performance of ChatGPT and Bard in a Text-Based Radiology Knowledge Assessment,” Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371231193716.
B. Kim, J. Seo, and M.-W. Koo, “Randomly Wired Network Based on RoBERTa and Dialog History Attention for Response Selection,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing, vol. 29, pp. 2437–2442, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP.2021.3077119.
J. Zhang, J. Zhang, S. Ma, J. Yang, and G. Gui, “Chatbot design method using hybrid word vector expression model based on real telemarketing data,” KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1400–1418, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.3837/TIIS.2020.04.001.
S. S. Abdullahi, S. Yiming, A. Abdullahi, and U. Aliyu, “Open Domain Chatbot Based on Attentive End-to-End Seq2Seq Mechanism,” in Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Artificial Intelligence, ser. ACAI ‘19. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, p. 339–344. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3377713.3377773.
A. G. Usigan, M. I. Salomeo, G. J. L. J. Zafe, C. J. Centeno, A. A. R. C. Sison, and A. G. Bitancor, “Implementation of an Undergraduate Admission Chatbot Using Microsoft Azure’s Question Answering and Bot Framework,” in Proceedings of the 2022 5th Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing Conference, ser. AICCC ‘22. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, p. 240–245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3582099.3582135.
E. Ruane, R. Young, and A. Ventresque, “Training a Chatbot with Microsoft LUIS: Effect of Intent Imbalance on Prediction Accuracy,” in Companion Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, ser. IUI ‘20 Companion. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, p. 63–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3379336.3381494.
N. Bhartiya, N. Jangid, S. Jannu, P. Shukla, and R. Chapaneri, “Artificial Neural Network Based University Chatbot System,” in 2019 IEEE Bombay Section Signature Conference, IBSSC 2019, vol. 2019January. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2019, Conference paper. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IBSSC47189.2019.8973095.
B. Hancock, A. Bordes, P.-E. Mazaré, and J. Weston, “Learning from dialogue after deployment: Feed yourself, Chatbot!” in ACL 2019 - 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2020, Conference paper, pp. 3667–3684.
M. N. Sreedhar, K. Ni, and S. Reddy, “Learning improvised chatbots from adversarial modifications of natural language feedback,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics Findings of ACL: EMNLP 2020, 2020, pp. 2445–2453.
S.-W. Lee and W.-J. Choi, “Utilizing ChatGPT in clinical research related to anesthesiology: a comprehensive review of opportunities and limitations,” Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 244–251, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.23056.
C. K. Lo, “What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature,” Education Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 410, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
A. Pack and J. Maloney, “Using Generative Artificial Intelligence for Language Education Research: Insights from Using OpenAI’s ChatGPT,” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1571–1582, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3253.
J. Chervenak, H. Lieman, M. Blanco-Breindel, and S. Jindal, “The promise and peril of using a large language model to obtain clinical information: ChatGPT performs strongly as a fertility counseling tool with limitations,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 575–583, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.05.151.
A. V. Riabko and T. A. Vakaliuk, “Physics on autopilot: exploring the use of an AI assistant for independent problem-solving practice,” Educational Technology Quarterly, vol. 2024, no. 1, p. 56–75, Mar. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.671.
OpenAI, “Introducing ChatGPT,” Nov. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt
DeepLearning.AI, “Search | The Batch | AI News & Insights,” Dec. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.deeplearning.ai/search/
“Big Bot Makes Small Talk: A research summary of Facebook’s Generative BST chatbot,” May 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.deeplearning.ai/the-batch/big-bot-makes-small-talk/
“Bot Comic: How Google’s Meena chatbot developed a sense of humor,” Feb. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.deeplearning.ai/the-batch/bot-comic/
“Chatbots for Productivity,” Sep. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.deeplearning.ai/the-batch/microsoft-extends-copilot-365-windows/
“China Chases Chatbots,” Mar. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.deeplearning.ai/the-batch/chinese-tech-companies-race-to-cash-in-on-chatgpt-fever/
“Search War!” Feb. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.deeplearning.ai/the-batch/google-and-microsoft-both-announce-ai-powered-search/
“Chatbots Disagree on Covid-19: Medical chatbots offered conflicting Covid advice,” Apr. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.deeplearning.ai/the-batch/chatbots-disagree-on-covid-19/
“Language Models, Extended: Large language models grew more reliable and less biased in 2022,” Dec. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.deeplearning.ai/the-batch/language-models-grew-more-reliable-and-less-biased-in-2022/
“Cost Containment for Generative AI: Microsoft’s quest to reduce the size and cost of language models,” Oct. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.deeplearning.ai/the-batch/microsofts-quest-to-reduce-the-size-and-cost-of-language-models/
“What We Know — and Don’t Know — About Foundation Models: A new Stanford index to assess the transparency of leading AI models,” Nov. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.deeplearning.ai/the-batch/a-new-stanford-index-to-assess-the-transparency-of-leading-ai-models/
Elsevier B.V., “Scopus - Document search | Signed in,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/search/form.uri?display=basic#basic
N. J. Van Eck and L. Waltman, VOSviewer Manual. Universiteit Leiden, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.20.pdf
Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands, “VOSviewer - Visualizing scientific landscapes,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.vosviewer.com/