Linguo-pragmatic parameters of English and Ukrainian literary mini-texts

Bilokonenko, Liudmyla; Novikova, Olga; Yeshchenko, Тetyana; Orenchak, Olha; Truba, Hanna; Білоконенко, Людмила Анатоліївна

URI: http://elibrary.kdpu.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/8888
https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v12i4.1234

Date: 2022-05

Abstract:

The problem of analysing the impact of literarymini-texts on a wide range of audiences has been partially coveredso far. The aim of the article was to investigate the analysis of hidden frame structures from the respondents’ answers on the basis ofliterarymini-texts about fashion. The functional-pragmatic aspect of the actualized texts prepared for the respondents, which was selected for analysis, allows identifyingthe hidden purpose and meaning of literarymini-texts in the fashion discourse in general. The study involveddiscursive, intentional methods, the method of cognitive modelling, a combination of assignmentssuch as“multiple choice”and free associative experiment (the method of enumeration). The experiment identified a model of a communicative event, the language structure of which is the most common in Vogue magazine’s literary mini-texts. The study showed the ratio of all types of communicative events in mini-texts, where the concepts of “challenge”, “time”, “effortlessness”are verbalized, each having certain language formulas in literary mini-texts about fashion. The materials of empirical research can be useful for methodological recommendations for university students when deepening multi-vector works on philology. A promising area of research is the selection and description of key concepts of the discourse of mini-texts in diachrony.

Description:

Bekhta, I., & Bekhta, T. (2019). Artistic text: psycholinguistic reflection of the concept. Scientific Proceedings of Ostroh Academy National University: Philology Series, 6 (74), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.25264/2519-2558-2019-6(74)-11-14 Bi, N. Z. (2021). Cognitive processes of ESL learners in pragmatic role-play tasks in academic settings. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 3607.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.586588 Capone, A. (2017). Presuppositions as conversational phenomena. Lingua, 198, 22-37. https://philpapers.org/rec/CAPPAC-2 Cohen, A. (2020). Considerations in assessing pragmatic appropriateness in spoken language. Language Teaching, 53, 183-202. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000156 Hameed, A. (2020). Presupposition triggers in British and Saudi English newspaper opinions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10 (7), 734-743. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1007.03 ISSN 1799-2591 Hamid, A., & Aziz, A. (2020). Language-based approach as a trend to enhance pupil’s interest in children’s literature. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9 (2), 318-333. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v9-i2/7346 Hilliard, A. (2017). Twelve Activities for Teaching the Pragmatics of Complaining to L2 Learners. English Teaching Forum, 55 (1), 2-13. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1137786.pdf Kalenych, V. (2020). Cognitive and communicative pragmatic parameters of intertextuality in mass media. Psycholinguistics, 27 (2), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797- 2020-27-2-155-173 Kharkovskaya, A., Ponomarenko, E., & Radyuk, A. (2017). Minitexts in modern educational discourse: Functions and trends. Training, Language and Culture, 1 (1), 62-76. https://doi.org/10.29366/2017tlc.1.1.4 Korolova, V. (2020). Destruction of communicative pragmatics in modern absurdist dramatic texts. Psycholinguistics, 27 (2), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2020-27-2-195- 212 Koval, N., & Makar, A. (2019). Linguopragmatic aspects of scientific and technical discourse. Molodyi vchenyi, 4.2 (68.2), 95-100. http://molodyvcheny.in.ua/files/journal/2019/4.2/23.pdf Kozub, L. (2019). The specifics of the pragmatic direction of emotional texts. International Journal of Philology, 10 (3), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2019.03.026 Ledeneva, S. (2017). Functional and pragmatic properties of linguistic means of advertising discourse. Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 31, 306-312. http://vestnikbrgu.ru/wp-content/numbers/v2017_1.pdf Liang, R., & Liu, Y. (2016). An analysis of presuppostion triggers in Hilary's First campaign speech. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6 (5), 68-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n5p68 Lupak, N. M., Kopotun, I. M., Hamza, A. V., Albul, S. V., & Panova, S. O. (2020). Creation of clusters and tools for improving the professional competence of future educators. European Journal of Educational Research, 9 (2), 709-716. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.709 Mahmood, R. (2019). The Dissolution of linguistics and the rise of language with reference to pragmatics: A deconstructive approach. Journal of the University of Human Development, 5.3, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.21928/juhd.v5n3y2019.pp1-5 Musiienko, Y. (2017). Linguo-cognitive and pragmatic features of the prosodic organization of English parables. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow, 1 (1), 210-261. https://doi.org/10.1515/lart-2017-0006 Perl, C. (2020). Presuppositions, attitudes, and why they matter. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 98 (2), 363-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2019.1621911 Polyakova, N., & Вervialle, В. (2016). La composante lexical commereflet de l'aspect national etcultureldans le discours des affaires Français. I. V. Skuratov (Ed.), Romanian Cultural and Language Heritage: History and Modernity (430-434). Moscow: Moscow State Regional University. Retrieved from https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27374361&pff=1 Rose, H., Briggs, J., Boggs, J., Sergio, L., & Ivanova-Slavianskaia, N. (2018). A systematic review of language learner strategy research in the face of self-regulation. System, 72, 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.12.002 Savchenko, L. (2019). The specifics of research on the pragmatics of the scientific text. International Humanitarian University Herald. Philology, 39 (1), 56-59. https://doi.org/10.32841/2409-1154.2019.39.1.13 Shabat-Savka, S. (2018). Psycholinguistic dimension of communicative intention: The substance of the speaker and syntax. Psycholinguistics, 24 (2), 321-339. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-2-321-339 Shpilnaya, N. (2019). Non-verbalized utterances as a manifestation of the polyphony of linguistic consciousness in psychosis. Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2 (40), 150-156. https://doi.org/10.30982/2077-5911-2019-40-2-150-156 Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y. (Eds.). (2018). Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second Language Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University. Tantucci, V. (2016). Textual factualization: The phenomenology of assertive reformulation and presupposition during a speech event. Journal of Pragmatics, 101,155- 171.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.007 Taranenko, S. (2019). Linguistic and stylistic features of the use of parceled constructions in a modern small-format prose work: communicative-pragmatic aspect. Scientific Notes of Ostroh Academy National University: Philology Series, 7 (75), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.25264/2519-2558-2019-7(75)-40-46 Tikan, J., & Potapenko, K. (2020). Pragmalinguistic features of reproduction of language means of expression in modern English media texts in Ukrainian. Young Scientist, 11 (87), 491- 494. https://doi.org/10.32839/2304-5809/2020-11-87-106 Youn, S., & Bi, N. (2019). Investigating test-takers' strategy use in task-based L2 pragmatic speaking assessment. Intercultural Pragmatics, 16 (2), 185-218. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip2019-0009 Zhan, J., Sun, Q., & Zhan, J. L. (2021). Effects of manipulating writing task complexity on learners’ performance in completing vocabulary and syntactic tasks. Language Teaching Research, June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211024360

Show full item record