JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
| dc.contributor.author | Achkan, Vitaliy V. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vlasenko, Kateryna V. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Лов'янова, Ірина Василівна | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rovenska, Olha H. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sitak, Iryna V. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chumak, Olena O. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Семеріков, Сергій Олексійович | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ачкан, Віталій Валентинович | |
| dc.contributor.author | Власенко, Катерина Володимирівна | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ровенська, Ольга | |
| dc.contributor.author | Сітак, Ірина Вікторівна | |
| dc.contributor.author | Чумак, Олена Олександрівна | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-02T19:27:44Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-01-02T19:27:44Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-05-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Achkan V. V. Web-based Support of a Higher School Teacher / Vitaliy V. Achkan, Kateryna V. Vlasenko, Iryna V. Lovianova, Olha H. Rovenska, Iryna V. Sitak, Olena O. Chumak, Serhiy O. Semerikov // Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Advances in Educational Technology - Volume 2: AET / Editors: Serhiy Semerikov, Viacheslav Osadchyi, Olena Kuzminska. – Setúbal : SciTePress, 2022. – P. 245-252. – DOI: 10.5220/0010930500003364 | uk |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-989-758-558-6 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://doi.org/10.5220/0010930500003364 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://elibrary.kdpu.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/7009 | |
| dc.description | Alharbi, M. T., Platt, A., and Al-Bayatti, A. H. (2013). Personal learning environment. International journal for e-learning security, 3(1):280–288. Alhassan, R. (2017). Exploring the relationship between web 2.0 tools self-efficacy and teachers use of these tools in their teaching. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4):217–228. Attwell, G. (2007). Personal Learning Environments - the future of eLearning? eLearning Papers, 2(1–7). Bennett, S., Bishop, A., Dalgarno, B., Waycott, J., and Kennedy, G. (2012). Implementing Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A collective case study. Computers & Education, 59(2):524–534. Bobyliev, D. Y. and Vihrova, E. V. (2021). Problems and prospects of distance learning in teaching fundamental subjects to future mathematics teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840(1):012002. Couros, A. V. (2006). Examining the Open Movement: Possibilities and implications for education. PhD thesis, The University of Regina. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/118036. courses.prometheus.org.ua (2021). Prometheus. https://courses.prometheus.org.ua/. Drexler, W. (2010). The networked student model for construction of personal learning environments: Balancing teacher control and student autonomy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3):369–385. gs.statcounter.com (2020). Statcounter globalststs. https://gs.statcounter.com. Kadle, A. (2010). Elements for constructing social learning environments. https://tinyurl.com/9jc4fp7u. khanacademy.org (2021). Khan Academy. https://khanacademy.org/. Kompen, R. T., Edirisingha, P., Canaleta, X., Alsina, M., and Monguet, J. M. (2019). Personal learning environments based on Web 2.0 services in higher education’. Telematics and Informatics, 38:194–206. Kompen, R. T., Edirisingha, P., and Monguet, J. M. (2009). Using web 2.0 applications as supporting tools for personal learning environments. In Lytras, M. D., Ordonez de Pablos, P., Damiani, E., Avison, D., Naeve, A., and Horner, D. G., editors, Best Practices for the Knowledge Society. Knowledge, Learning, Development and Technology for All, pages 33–40, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Livotov, P. (2015). Web-based asynchronous distance education in new product development and inventive problem solving for industrial companies. Procedia Engineering, 131:123–139. Lovianova, I., Vlasenko, K., Sitak, I., Akulenko, I., and Kondratyeva, O. (2020). Model of the on-line course for training master students majoring in mathematics for teaching at university. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(9):3883–3894. Morrison, D. (2013). How to create a personal learning environment to stay relevant in 2013. https://tinyurl.com/3fdxnemu. openscience.in.ua (2021). Open Science in Ukraine. https://openscience.in.ua/. orcid.org (2021). ORCID. https://orcid.org. Pappas, C. (2013). The 5 best free collaboration tools for teachers. https://elearningindustry.com/the-5-best-free-collaboration-tools-for-teachers. Perikos, I., Grivokostopoulou, F., Kovas, K., and Hatzilygeroudis, I. (2015). Assisting tutors to utilize Web 2.0 tools in education. In International Conference e-Learning, pages 121–128. PIAAC (2019). Survey of Adult Skills. https://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/. Popel, M., Shokalyuk, S., and Shyshkina, M. (2017). The learning technique of the SageMathCloud use for students collaboration support. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1844:327–339. publons.com (2021). Publons. https://publons.com.Quinn, C. (2009). The performance environment. https://blog.learnlets.com/2009/08/the-performance-environment/. Rosen, D. and Nelson, C. (2008). Web 2.0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in the Schools, 25(3):211–225. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/104752. Scherer Bassani, P. B. and Ferrari Barbosa, D. N. (2018). Experiences with Web 2.0 in school settings: A framework to foster educational practices based on a personal learning environment perspective. Educação em Revista, 34. Segura, J. A. and Quintero, L. J. C. (2010). Los entornos personales de aprendizaje (ples): una nueva manera de entender el aprendizaje. In Vila, R. R. and Fiorucci, M., editors, Claves para la investigación en innovación y calidadeducativas. La integración de las Tecnologı́as de la Información y la Comunicación y la Interculturalidad en las aulas. Stumenti di ricerca per l’innovaziones e la qualità in ámbito educativo. La Tecnologie dell’informazione e della Comunicaziones e l’interculturalità nella scuola, pages 19–30. Marfil – Roma TRE Universita degli studi, Alcoy. Shaikh, Z. A. and Khoja, S. A. (2012). Role of teacher in personal learning environments. Digital Education Review, 21(2):23–32. Tautkevičienė, G. and Dubosas, M. (2014). The purposes of students’ use of Web 2.0 tools for learning at the university. Journal of emerging trends in computing and information sciences, 5(12):963–967. thegeekpage.com (2019). Top 30 best free math software you can use. https://thegeekpage.com/best-free-math-softwares/. van Harmelen, M. (2006). Personal learning environments. In Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT’06), pages 815–816. Vlasenko, K. (2019). Higher school mathematics teacher. http://formathematics.com/. Vlasenko, K. and Chumak, O. (2020). Personal e- learning environment of the maths teacher. http://formathematics.com/courses/imt/personal-e-learning-environment-of-the-maths-teacher/. Vlasenko, K., Chumak, O., Achkan, V., Lovianova, I., and Kondratyeva, O. (2020a). Personal e-learning environment of a mathematics teacher. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8):3527–3535. Vlasenko, K., Chumak, O., Lovianova, I., Kovalenko, D., and Volkova, N. (2020b). Methodical requirements for training materials of on-line courses on the platform ”Higher school mathematics teacher”. E3S Web of Conferences, 166:10011. Walsh, K. (2014). 20 fun free tools for interactive classroom collaboration. https://www.emergingedtech.com/2014/05/20-excellent-free-tools-for-interactive-collaboration-experiences-in-the-classroom/. www.coursera.org (2021). Coursera. https://www.coursera.org/. www.edx.org (2021). edX. https://www.edx.org/. www.linkedin.com (2021). LinkedIn Learning. https://www.linkedin.com/learning/. www.scopus.com (2021). Scopus. https://www.scopus.com. www.toptools4learning.com (2020). Top tools for learning 2020. https://www.toptools4learning.com/. Yadav, A. K. S. and Patwardhan, A. A. (2016). Use and impact of Web 2.0 tools in higher education: A literature review. In Parmar, S. and Siwach, A. K., editors, Academic Libraries in Electronic Environment, pages 218–246. Intellectual Foundation, India. | uk |
| dc.description.abstract | The article looks into the issue of theoretical aspects of using Web~2.0 technology in higher education. This paper describes the answers of 87 respondents who have helped to find out the types of activities that higher school teaches carry out and determine such Web~2.0 tools that can make this activity full. The authors carry out a theoretical analysis of researches and resources that consider the development of theoretical aspects of using Web tools in higher education. The research presents the characteristics common to online courses, principles of providing a functioning and physical placement of online systems in Web space. It is reasonable to make a conclusion about the feasibility of promoting online courses, the aim of which is to get Mathematics teachers acquainted with the technical capabilities of creating educational content developed using Web~2.0 technology. | uk |
| dc.language.iso | en | uk |
| dc.publisher | SciTePress | uk |
| dc.subject | mathematics teachers | uk |
| dc.subject | types of activities | uk |
| dc.subject | web-tools | uk |
| dc.subject | a personal e-learning environment model | uk |
| dc.title | Web-based Support of a Higher School Teacher | uk |
| dc.type | Article | uk |
