DSpace Repository

Fuzzy cluster analysis of indicators for assessing the potential of recreational forest use

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kryzhanivs'kyi, Evstakhii
dc.contributor.author Horal, Liliana
dc.contributor.author Perevozova, Iryna
dc.contributor.author Shyiko, Vira
dc.contributor.author Mykytiuk, Nataliia
dc.contributor.author Berlous, Maria
dc.date.accessioned 2021-09-07T15:36:21Z
dc.date.available 2021-09-07T15:36:21Z
dc.date.issued 2020-10-26
dc.identifier.citation Kryzhanivs'kyi E. Fuzzy cluster analysis of indicators for assessing the potential of recreational forest use / Evstakhii Kryzhanivs'kyi, Liliana Horal, Iryna Perevozova, Vira Shyiko, Nataliia Mykytiuk, Maria Berlous // CEUR Workshop Proceedings. - Vol. 2713. - P. 125-144. uk
dc.identifier.issn 1613-0073
dc.identifier.uri http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2713/paper07.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://elibrary.kdpu.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/4470
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/4470
dc.description.abstract Cluster analysis of the efficiency of the recreational forest use of the region by separate components of the recreational forest use potential is provided in the article. The main stages of the cluster analysis of the recreational forest use level based on the predetermined components were determined. Among the agglomerative methods of cluster analysis, intended for grouping and combining the objects of study, it is common to distinguish the three most common types: the hierarchical method or the method of tree clustering; the K-means Clustering Method and the two-step aggregation method. For the correct selection of clusters, a comparative analysis of several methods was performed: arithmetic mean ranks, hierarchical methods followed by dendrogram construction, K- means method, which refers to reference methods, in which the number of groups is specified by the user. The cluster analysis of forestries by twenty analytical grounds was not proved by analysis of variance, so the re-clustering of certain objects was carried out according to the nine most significant analytical features. As a result, the forestry was clustered into four clusters. The conducted cluster analysis with the use of different methods allows us to state that their combination helps to select reasonable groupings, clearly illustrate the clustering procedure and rank the obtained forestry clusters. uk
dc.language.iso en uk
dc.publisher CEUR Workshop Proceedings uk
dc.subject cluster analysis uk
dc.subject k-means clustering method uk
dc.subject forestry uk
dc.subject recreation uk
dc.title Fuzzy cluster analysis of indicators for assessing the potential of recreational forest use uk
dc.type Article uk


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics