DSpace Repository

Training elementary school teachers-to-be at Computer Science lessons to evaluate e-tools

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Olefirenko, Nadiia V.
dc.contributor.author Kostikova, Ilona I.
dc.contributor.author Ponomarova, Nataliia O.
dc.contributor.author Lebedieva, Kateryna O.
dc.contributor.author Andriievska, Vira M.
dc.contributor.author Pikilnyak, Andrey V.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-28T18:31:45Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-28T18:31:45Z
dc.date.issued 2020-07-20
dc.identifier.citation Olefirenko N. V. Training elementary school teachers-to-be at Computer Science lessons to evaluate e-tools / Nadiia V. Olefirenko, Ilona I. Kostikova, Nataliia O. Ponomarova, Kateryna O. Lebedieva, Vira M. Andriievska, Andrey V. Pikilnyak // Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education (CTE 2019), Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, December 20, 2019 / Edited by : Arnold E. Kiv, Mariya P. Shyshkina // CEUR Workshop Proceedings. – Vol. 2643. – Pp. 578–591. – Access mode : http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2643/paper34.pdf uk_UA
dc.identifier.issn 1613-0073
dc.identifier.uri http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2643/paper34.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://elibrary.kdpu.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/3890
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/3890
dc.description 1. Abdula, A.I., Baluta, H.A., Kozachenko, N.P., Kassim, D.A.: Peculiarities of using of the Moodle test tools in philosophy teaching. In: Kiv, A.E., Shyshkina, M.P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education (CTE 2019), Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, December 20, 2019, CEUR-WS.org, online (2020, in press) 2. Alayyar, G.M., Fisser, P., Voogt, J.: Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service science teachers: support from blended learning. Australasian journal of educational technology 28(8), 1298–1316 (2012). doi:10.14742/ajet.773 3. Babenko, V.O., Yatsenko, R.M., Migunov, P.D., Salem, A.B.M.: MarkHub Cloud Online Editor as a modern web-based book creation tool. In: Kiv, A.E., Shyshkina, M.P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education (CTE 2019), Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, December 20, 2019, CEUR-WS.org, online (2020, in press) 4. Ball, S.: Evaluating Educational Programs. In: Bennett R., von Davier M. (eds). Advancing Human Assessment. Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment, pp. 341– 362. Springer, Cham (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58689-2_11 5. Bredtmann, J., Crede, C. J., Otten, S.: Methods for evaluating educational programs: does writing center participation affect student achievement? Evaluation and Program Planning 36(1), 115–123 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.09.003 6. Buchholtz, N.F., Krosanke, N., Orschulik, A.B., Vorhölter, K.: Combining and integrating formative and summative assessment in mathematics teacher education. ZDM Mathematics Education 50(4), 715–728 (2018). doi:10.1007/s11858-018-0948-y 7. Dym, C., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D., Leifer, L.: Engineering design thinking, teaching and learning. Journal of Engineering Education 94(1), 103–120 (2013). doi:10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2005.tb00832.x 8. Fox, M.A., Hackerman, N.: Evaluating and Improving Undergraduate Teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. National Research Council. The National Academies Press, Washington (2003). doi:10.17226/10024 9. Hativa, N.: Teaching for Effective Learning in Higher Education. Springer, Dordrecht (2000). doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0902-7 10. Hu, Z., Petoukhov, S., Dychka, I., He, M. (eds.): Advances in Computer Science for Engineering and Education II. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 938. Springer, Cham (2019). doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16621-2 11. Ivanova, H.I., Lavrentieva, O.O., Eivas, L.F., Zenkovych, Iu.O., Uchitel, A.D.: The students’ brainwork intensification via the computer visualization of study materials. In: Kiv, A.E., Shyshkina, M.P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education (CTE 2019), Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, December 20, 2019, CEUR-WS.org, online (2020, in press) 12. Kostikova, I.I., Gulich, O.O., Holubnycha, L.O., Besarab, T.P.: Interactive whiteboard use at English lessons: from university students to young learners. Espacios 40(12), 10 (2019) 13. Kostikova, I.I.: Information and communication technologies in students’ language learning. International Journal of Education and Science 1(1-2), 7–14 (2018). doi:10.26697/ijes.2018.1-2.01 14. Kozlovsky, E.O., Kravtsov, H.M.: Multimedia virtual laboratory for physics in the distance learning. In: Semerikov, S.O., Shyshkina, M.P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education (CTE 2017), Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, April 28, 2017. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2168, 42–53. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2168/paper7.pdf (2018). Accessed 21 Mar 2019 15. Kravtsov, H., Pulinets, A.: Interactive Augmented Reality Technologies for Model Visualization in the School Textbook. CEUR-WS.org, online (2020, in press) 16. Landeta, J.: Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73(5), 467–482 (2006) 17. Leshchenko, M., Hrynko, V., Kosheliev, O.: Methods of Designing Digital Learning Technologies for Developing Primary School Pre-Service Teachers’ 21st Century Skills. CEUR-WS.org, online (2020, in press) 18. Midak, L.Ya., Kravets, I.V., Kuzyshyn, O.V., Pahomov, J.D., Lutsyshyn, V.M., Uchitel, A.D.: Augmented reality technology within studying natural subjects in primary school. In: Kiv, A.E., Shyshkina, M.P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Augmented Reality in Education (AREdu 2019), Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, March 22, 2019. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2547, 251–261. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2547/paper18.pdf (2020). Accessed 10 Feb 2020 19. Mintii, I.S., Shokaliuk, S.V., Vakaliuk, T.A., Mintii, M.M., Soloviev, V.N.: Import test questions into Moodle LMS. In: Kiv, A.E., Soloviev, V.N. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education (CTE 2018), Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, December 21, 2018. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2433, 529–540. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol2433/paper36.pdf (2019). Accessed 10 Sep 2019 20. Nechypurenko, P.P., Starova, T.V., Selivanova, T.V., Tomilina, A.O., Uchitel, A.D.: Use of Augmented Reality in Chemistry Education. In: Kiv, A.E., Soloviev, V.N. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Augmented Reality in Education (AREdu 2018), Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, October 2, 2018. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2257, 15–23. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2257/paper02.pdf (2018). Accessed 30 Nov 2018 21. Oko, B.A., Uwatt, L.: ICT and Teachers’ Performance in Terms of Lesson Preparation and Delivery in Primary Schools in Ogoja Education Zone of Cross River State, Nigeria. Global Journal of Educational Research 14(2), 87–92 (2015). doi:10.4314/gjedr.v14i1.2 22. Olefirenko, N. (2012). Use GeoGebra In Primary Pupils Training. GeoGebra International Journal of Romania 2(2), 40 (2013) 23. Olefirenko, N.V., Kostikova, I.I., Ponomarova, N.O., Bilousova, L.I., Pikilnyak, A.V.: Elearning resources for successful math teaching to pupils of primary school. In: Kiv, A.E., Soloviev, V.N. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education (CTE 2018), Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, December 21, 2018. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2433, 443–458. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2433/paper30.pdf (2019). Accessed 10 Sep 2019 24. Pepin, B., Choppin, J., Ruthven, K., Sinclair, N.: Digital curriculum resources in mathematics education: foundations for change. ZDM Mathematics Education 49(5), 645– 661 (2017). doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0879-z 25. Quality Criteria for Digital Learning Resources, Version 1.0. http://eqnet.eun.org/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=11090&name=DLFE-101.pdf (2010). Accessed 28 Nov 2019 26. Schilling, K., Applegate, R.: Best methods for evaluating educational impact: a comparison of the efficacy of commonly used measures of library instruction. Journal of the Medical Library Association 100(4), 258–269 (2012). doi:10.3163/1536-5050.100.4.007 27. Shadreck, M.: Integrating ICTs into the environmental science primary school classroom in Chegutu district, Zimbabwe: problems and solutions. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 3(1), 90–96 (2015) 28. Shapovalov, V.B., Shapovalov, Ye.B., Bilyk, Zh.I., Megalinska, A.P., Muzyka, I.O.: The Google Lens analyzing quality: an analysis of the possibility to use in the educational process. In: Kiv, A.E., Shyshkina, M.P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Augmented Reality in Education (AREdu 2019), Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, March 22, 2019. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2547, 117–129. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol2547/paper09.pdf (2020). Accessed 10 Feb 2020 29. Shyshkina, M.P., Kohut, U.P., Popel, M.V.: The Design and Evaluation of the Cloud-based Learning Components with the Use of the Systems of Computer Mathematics. In: Ermolayev, V., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Yakovyna, V., Kharchenko, V., Kobets, V., Kravtsov, H., Peschanenko, V., Prytula, Ya., Nikitchenko, M., Spivakovsky A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications. Integration, Harmonization and Knowledge Transfer (ICTERI, 2018), Kyiv, Ukraine, 14-17 May 2018, vol. II: Workshops. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2104, 305–317. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2104/paper_156.pdf (2018). Accessed 30 Nov 2018 30. Striuk, A.M., Rassovytska, M.V., Shokaliuk, S.V.: Using Blippar Augmented Reality Browser in the Practical Training of Mechanical Engineers. In: Ermolayev, V., SuárezFigueroa, M.C., Yakovyna, V., Kharchenko, V., Kobets, V., Kravtsov, H., Peschanenko, V., Prytula, Ya., Nikitchenko, M., Spivakovsky A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications. Integration, Harmonization and Knowledge Transfer (ICTERI, 2018), Kyiv, Ukraine, 14- 17 May 2018, vol. II: Workshops. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2104, 412–419. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2104/paper_223.pdf (2018). Accessed 30 Nov 2018 31. Tkachuk, V., Yechkalo, Yu., Semerikov, S., Kislova, M., Khotskina, V.: Exploring Student Uses of Mobile Technologies in University Classrooms: Audience Response Systems and Development of Multimedia. CEUR-WS.org, online (2020, in press) 32. UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers. UNESCO, Paris (2011) 33. Vongkulluksn, V.W., Matewos, A.M., Sinatra, G.M., Marsh, J.A.: Motivational factors in makerspaces: a mixed methods study of elementary school students’ situational interest, self-efficacy, and achievement emotions. International Journal of STEM Education 5, 43. (2018). doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0129-0 34. Wambiri Njeri, G., Nyokabi Ndani, M.: Kenya primary school teachers’ preparation in ICT teaching: teacher beliefs, attitudes, self-efficacy, computer competence, and age. African Journal of Teacher Education 5(1) (2017). doi:10.21083/ajote.v5i1.3515 35. Yaroshenko, O.G., Samborska, O.D., Kiv, A.E.: An integrated approach to digital training of prospective primary school teachers. In: Kiv, A.E., Shyshkina, M.P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education (CTE 2019), Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, December 20, 2019, CEUR-WS.org, online (2020, in press) 36. Ziemba, P., Piwowarski, M., Jankowski, J., Wątróbski, J.: Method of Criteria Selection and Weights Calculation in the Process of Web Projects Evaluation. In: Hwang, D., Jung, J.J., Nguyen, NT. (eds.) Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications. ICCCI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8733, pp. 684–693. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11289-3_69
dc.description.abstract The study purpose is to develop methodological support for students’ training for evaluation e-tools for young learners and to check its effectiveness experimentally. The module “Expert evaluation of the quality of e-tools for young learners” is offered for teachers-to-be. The determination of the weighting factor of each criterion by expert evaluations was organized. Educational principles, correlation e-tool content with the curriculum, interactivity, multimedia, assistance system, ergonomic requirements are mentioned. On the basis of the criterion rank, the significance of each criterion was calculated. The indicators to determine the level of preliminary expert evaluations of e-tools are proposed. The results are calculated with nonparametric methods of mathematical statistics, in particular, Pearson’s criterion χ2. The conclusion is the expert evaluation has different activity stages, gradually becoming a common phenomenon. Training teachers-to-be for e-tool expert evaluation at Computer Science, Mathematics, English is a complex process. uk_UA
dc.language.iso en uk_UA
dc.publisher Arnold E. Kiv, Mariya P. Shyshkina uk_UA
dc.subject e-tools uk_UA
dc.subject young learners uk_UA
dc.subject elementary school uk_UA
dc.subject experimental research uk_UA
dc.subject expert evaluation uk_UA
dc.subject weighting factor uk_UA
dc.title Training elementary school teachers-to-be at Computer Science lessons to evaluate e-tools uk_UA
dc.type Article uk_UA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics