DSpace Repository
A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing Scientific Research Effectiveness Among Academic and Research Staff
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
| dc.contributor.author | Ivanova, Svitlana M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Spirin, Oleg M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shymon, Oleksandr M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vakaliuk, Tetiana A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Мінтій, Ірина Сергіївна | |
| dc.contributor.author | Семеріков, Сергій Олексійович | |
| dc.contributor.author | Вакалюк, Тетяна Анатоліївна | |
| dc.contributor.author | Іванова, Світлана Миколаївна | |
| dc.contributor.author | Спірін, Олег Михайлович | |
| dc.contributor.author | Шимон, Олександр Михайлович | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-03T06:51:18Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-12-03T06:51:18Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-08-28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ivanova S. M. A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing Scientific Research Effectiveness Among Academic and Research Staff / Svitlana M. Ivanova, Oleg M. Spirin, Oleksandr M. Shymon, Tetiana A. Vakaliuk, Iryna S. Mintii, Serhiy O. Semerikov // Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on History, Theory and Methodology of Learning (ICHTML 2023) / editors : Serhiy Semerikov, Vita Hamaniuk, Pavlo Nechypurenko, Yaroslav Shramko. – Setúbal : SciTePress, 2024. – P. 156-162. – DOI: 10.5220/0012648300003737 | uk |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-989-758-579-1 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2976-0836 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5220/0000176600003737 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scitepress.org/Link.aspx?doi=10.5220/0012648300003737 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://elibrary.kdpu.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/10939 | |
| dc.description | Bykov, V. Y., Spirin, O. M., Ivanova, S. M., Vakaliuk, T. A., Mintii, I. S., and Kilchenko, A. V. (2021). Scientometric indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of pedagogical research of scientific institutions and educational institutions. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 86(6):289–312. Cao, R., Geng, Y., Xu, X., and Wang, X. (2022). How does duplicate tweeting boost social media exposure to scholarly articles? Journal of Informetrics, 16(1). Masic, I. and Begic, E. (2016). Evaluation of scientific journal validity, it’s articles and their authors. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 226:9–14. Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., and Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. Profesional De La Informacion, 29(1). Morze, N. V., Buinytska, O. P., and Smirnova, V. A. (2022). Designing a rating system based on competencies for the analysis of the university teachers’ research activities. CTE Workshop Proceedings, 9:139–153. Order (2021). Rozporiadzhennia № 04 vid 25 travnia 2021 roku [Order № 04 of May 25, 2021]. Salinas, M., Giorgi, D., Ponchio, F., and Cignoni, P. (2020). ReviewerNet: A visualization platform for the selection of academic reviewers. Computers and Graphics, 89:77–87. Shirazi, M. S. and Valinejadi, A. (2021). Investigating of Association between Altmetrics Activity Indicators and Citation Quality Indicators in Iranian Medical Journals. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12(1):156. Singh, V. K., Srichandan, S. S., and Lathabai, H. H. (2022). ResearchGate and Google Scholar: How much do they differ in publications, citations and different metrics and why? Scientometrics, 127(3):1515–1542. Spirin, O. M. and Vakaliuk, T. A. (2017). Criteria of open web-operated technologies of teaching the fundamentals of programs of future teachers of informatics. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 60(4):275–287. Strategy (2020). Stratehiia rozvytku vyshchoi osvity v Ukraini na 2021-2031 roky [Strategy for the Development of Higher Education in Ukraine for 2021-2031]. Vakaliuk, T. A., Ivanova, S. M., and Kilchenko, A. V. (2021a). Electronic portfolio as a tool of reflecting the results of scientific and pedagogical activities of teachers of higher education institutions. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series: “Pedagogy. Social Work”, 1(48):53–58. Vakaliuk, T. A., Mintii, I. S., Hamaniuk, V. A., and Ivanova, S. M. (2022). Recording the practice of teaching staff in project activities and the preparation of winners in competitions and olympiads. Scientific innovations and advanced technologies, 4(6):22–34. Vakaliuk, T. A., Spirin, O. M., Mintiy, I. S., Ivanova, S. M., and Novytska, T. L. (2021b). Scientometric indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of pedagogical research of scientists and research and teaching staff. Modern Information Technologies and Innovation Methodologies of Education in Professional Training Methodology Theory Experience Problems, 60:167–184. Wiechetek, L. and Pastuszak, Z. (2022). Academic social networks metrics: An effective indicator for university performance? Scientometrics, 127(3):1381–1401. Xu, Z., Yang, D., and Chen, B. (2021). Career difficulties that Chinese academic journal editors face and their causes. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 52(4):212–232. Yu, X., Wu, S., Chen, W., Zheng, W., Huang, M., Yang, L., and Zhou, S. (2021). Exploring the associations between perceived organizational support and job burnout among chinese academic journal editors: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(22). | uk |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper addresses the crucial task of devising comprehensive criteria and indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of pedagogical research conducted by academic and research staff in higher education institutions (HEIs). Four major assessment criteria are identified: publication and dissemination, utilization, impact on the academic community, and representation-scientific. Each criterion is further broken down into specific indicators, including involvement in project competitions, scientific publications in reputable journals and conference proceedings, indices and citations in various databases, altmetric indicators such as electronic repositories and social media engagement, expert involvement in academic and research activities, and attainment of academic titles and honors. The classification of these criteria provides a systematic framework for assessing the multifaceted aspects of pedagogical research effectiveness. Further research prospects involve assigning weight coe fficients to these criteria and developing a methodology that integrates digital technologies to streamline the assessment process. | uk |
| dc.language.iso | en | uk |
| dc.publisher | SciTePress | uk |
| dc.subject | research | uk |
| dc.subject | assessment criteria | uk |
| dc.subject | academic staff | uk |
| dc.subject | research staff | uk |
| dc.subject | higher education institutions | uk |
| dc.subject | effectiveness | uk |
| dc.subject | indicators | uk |
| dc.subject | criteria | uk |
| dc.title | A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing Scientific Research Effectiveness Among Academic and Research Staff | uk |
| dc.type | Article | uk |
