DSpace Repository

Automating literature screening with large language models

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Семеріков, Сергій Олексійович
dc.contributor.author Мінтій, Ірина Сергіївна
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-11T17:32:12Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-11T17:32:12Z
dc.date.issued 2024-05-24
dc.identifier.citation Semerikov S. O. Automating literature screening with large language models / S. O. Semerikov, I. S. Mintii // Conference proceedings of the VII International Scientific-Practical Conference “Information Technology for Education, Science and Technics” (ITEST-2024), (Cherkasy, May 23-24, 2024). – Cherkasy : ChSTU, 2024. – P. 130-132. uk
dc.identifier.uri https://itest.chdtu.edu.ua/Conference-Proceedings-ITEST-2024_25_06.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://elibrary.kdpu.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/10385
dc.description 1. Mintii, M.M., 2023. Exploring the landscape of STEM education and personnel training: a comprehensive systematic review. Educational Dimension, 9, pp.149–172. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31812/ed.583 2. Hamaniuk, V.A., 2021. The potential of Large Language Models in language education. Educational Dimension, 5, pp.208–210. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31812/ed.650 uk
dc.description.abstract Screening research papers for inclusion in a literature review is a time-consuming manual process. We explore automating this process using OpenAI’s GPT-3.5 Turbo large language model (LLM). Given text prompts specifying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, the LLM evaluated the abstract of each paper. It is classified into one of four categories: meeting both criteria, violating the first criteria, violating the second criteria, or violating both criteria. Our Python code interfaced with the OpenAI API to pass paper abstracts as prompts to the LLM. For 347 papers, the LLM flagged 173 as meeting the criteria, with 3 additional papers included after accounting for missing abstracts, yielding 176 papers selected for full-text retrieval. A manual review of a sample suggested reasonable accuracy. While further validation is needed, this demonstrates LLMs’ potential for accelerating systematic literature reviews. uk
dc.language.iso en uk
dc.publisher ЧДТУ uk
dc.subject large language models uk
dc.subject GPT-3 uk
dc.subject literature review uk
dc.subject automation uk
dc.subject screening uk
dc.subject inclusion criteria uk
dc.title Automating literature screening with large language models uk
dc.type Article uk


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics