Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал:
http://elibrary.kdpu.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/4370Повний запис метаданих
| Поле DC | Значення | Мова |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Tsidylo, Ivan M. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Семеріков, Сергій Олексійович | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Gargula, Tetiana I. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Solonetska, Hanna V. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zamora, Yaroslav P. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Pikilnyak, Andrey V. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-21T19:07:25Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-06-21T19:07:25Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-06-10 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Tsidylo I. M. Simulation of intellectual system for evaluation of multilevel test tasks on the basis of fuzzy logic / Ivan M. Tsidylo, Serhiy O. Semerikov, Tetiana I. Gargula, Hanna V. Solonetska, Yaroslav P. Zamora, Andrey V. Pikilnyak // Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education (CTE 2020). Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, December 18, 2020 / Edited by : Serhiy O. Semerikov, Mariya P. Shyshkina // CEUR Workshop Proceedings. – 2021. – Vol. 2879. – P. 507-520. – Access mode : http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2879/paper30.pdf | uk |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1613-0073 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2879/paper30.pdf | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://elibrary.kdpu.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/4370 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/4370 | - |
| dc.description | [1] I. D. Rudinskiy, Fuzzy knowledge evaluation model as a methodological basis for automation of pedagogical testing, IEEE Transactions on Education 50 (2007) 68–73. doi:10.1109/TE.2006.888904. [2] O. Cherednichenko, O. Yangolenko, Towards quality monitoring and evaluation methodology: Higher education case-study, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 137 (2013) 120–127. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38370-0_11. [3] L. He, W. He, Study on the construction of internal monitoring system of chinese independent colleges’ education quality, Genova, 2009, pp. 191–194. [4] E. Igbape, P. Idogho, N-dimension data visualization spaces for academic programmes quality monitoring in nigeria higher education, volume 2019-October, Newswood Limited, 2019, pp. 238–242. [5] M. Leontev, N. Bondarenko, T. Shebzuhova, S. Butko, L. Egorova, Improving the efficiency of university management: Teacher’s performance monitoring as a tool to promote the quality of education, European Research Studies Journal 21 (2018) 527–540. doi:10.35808/ ersj/1020. [6] Y. Li, P. Li, F. Zhu, R. Wang, Design of higher education quality monitoring and evaluation platform based on big data, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017, pp. 337–342. doi:10.1109/ICCSE.2017.8085513. [7] N. Muhd Nor, M. Azlan, S. Kiong, F. Mohamad, A. Ismail, A. Kasmin, M. Ahmad, S. Yokoyama, Development of course management and monitoring system as a quality tools in engineering education, Applied Mechanics and Materials 465-466 (2014) 395–400. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.465-466.395. [8] F. Qin, W. Zeng, L. Li, R. Zhao, Construction of big data monitoring platform for teaching quality under intelligent education, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2020, pp. 1594–1597. doi:10.1109/IWCMC48107.2020.9148224. [9] A. Sorour, A. Atkins, C. Stanier, F. Alharbi, Comparative frameworks for monitoring quality assurance in higher education institutions using business intelligence, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2020. doi:10.1109/ICCIT-144147971.2020.9213808. [10] C. Wei, Higher vocational education quality monitoring system, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering 217 LNEE (2013) 55–60. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-4850-0_8. [11] Z. Zhi, Z. Nan, Study on the construction of teaching quality monitoring system for the undergraduate physical education majors, Jilin, 2011, pp. 758–761. doi:10.1109/HHBE. 2011.6028937. [12] A. Anohina-Naumeca, M. Strautmane, J. Grundspenkis, Development of the scoring mechanism for the concept map based intelligent knowledge assessment system, volume 471, Sofia, 2010, pp. 376–381. doi:10.1145/1839379.1839446. [13] A. Anohina-Naumeca, J. Grundspenkis, Evaluating students’ concept maps in the concept map based intelligent knowledge assessment system, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 5968 LNCS (2010) 8–15. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12082-4_2. [14] K. Gierłowski, K. Nowicki, A novel architecture for e-learning knowledge assessment systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 4823 LNCS (2008) 276–287. doi:10.1007/ 978-3-540-78139-4_25. [15] J. Grundspenkis, Intelligent knowledge assessment systems: Myth or reality, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 315 (2019) 31–46. doi:10.3233/ 978-1-61499-941-6-31. [16] B. Schmuck, D. Sima, S. Szöllosi, The design space of the implementation of knowledge assessment systems, Sydney, NSW, 2006, pp. 587–593. doi:10.1109/ITHET.2006.339672. [17] S. Szöllosi, D. Sima, B. Schmuck, The design space of the services of knowledge assessment systems, Sydney, NSW, 2006, pp. 571–578. doi:10.1109/ITHET.2006.339816. [18] V. Bespalko, Requirements of educational films for professional and technical education, Soviet Education 2 (1960) 17–19. doi:10.2753/RES1060-9393020317. [19] R. Linn, Validating inferences from national assessment of educational progress achievement-level reporting, Applied Measurement in Education 11 (1998) 23–47. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1101_2. [20] C. Clotfelter, H. Ladd, J. Vigdor, Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness, Journal of Human Resources 41 (2006) 778–820. doi:10.3368/jhr.xli.4. 778. [21] N. Falchikov, D. Boud, Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research 59 (1989) 395–430. doi:10.3102/00346543059004395. [22] N. Falchikov, J. Goldfinch, Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks, Review of Educational Research 70 (2000) 287–322. doi:10.3102/00346543070003287. [23] M. Host, B. Regnell, C. Wohlin, Using students as subjects - a comparative study of students and professionals in lead-time impact assessment, Empirical Software Engineering 5 (2000) 201–214. doi:10.1023/A:1026586415054. [24] G.-J. Hwang, H.-F. Chang, A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students, Computers and Education 56 (2011) 1023–1031. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.002. [25] D. Newble, K. Jaeger, The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students, Medical Education 17 (1983) 165–171. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923. 1983.tb00657.x. [26] V. V. Osadchyi, K. P. Osadcha, H. B. Varina, S. V. Shevchenko, I. S. Bulakh, Specific features of the use of augmented reality technologies in the process of the development of cognitive component of future professionals’ mental capacity, Journal of Physics: Conference Series (2021). [27] C. Rust, M. Price, O. Berry, Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 28 (2003) 147–164. doi:10.1080/02602930301671. [28] K. Scouller, The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay, Higher Education 35 (1998) 453–472. doi:10.1023/A:1003196224280. [29] K. Topping, Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities, Review of Educational Research 68 (1998) 249–276. doi:10.3102/00346543068003249. [30] D. Wiliam, C. Lee, C. Harrison, P. Black, Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 11 (2004) 49–65. doi:10.1080/0969594042000208994. [31] T. Barker, An automated feedback system based on adaptive testing: Extending the model, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning 5 (2010) 11–14. doi:10.3991/ ijet.v5i2.1235. [32] M. Phankokkruad, K. Woraratpanya, An automated decision system for computer adaptive testing using genetic algorithms, Phuket, 2008, pp. 655–660. doi:10.1109/SNPD.2008. 118. [33] B. Buyak, I. Tsidylo, V. Repskyi, V. Lyalyuk, Stages of conceptualization and formalization in the design of the model of the neuro-fuzzy expert system of professional selection of pupils, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2257 (2018) 112–121. [34] H. V. Tereshchuk, I. M. Tsidylo, Automated system of fuzzy identification of expert’s competence for assessing the quality of pedagogical phenomena and processes, Information Technologies and Learning Tools 64 (2018) 234–244. URL: https://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index. php/itlt/article/view/2079. doi:10.33407/itlt.v64i2.2079. [35] A. Taylor, Fuzzy Logic With Matlab: Analyzing, Designing, and Simulating Systems, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2017. [36] I. Lutsyk, Y. Franko, V. Rak, I. Lutsyk, R. Leshchii, O. Potapchuk, Mathematical modeling of energy-efficient active ventilation modes of granary, in: 2019 9th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT), 2019, pp. 105–108. doi:10. 1109/ACITT.2019.8780109. [37] S. Shtovba, O. Pankevich, A. Nagorna, Analyzing the criteria for fuzzy classifier learning, Automatic Control and Computer Sciences 49 (2015) 123–132. doi:10.3103/ S0146411615030098. [38] A. Rotshtein, S. Shtovba, Predicting the reliability of algorithmic processes with fuzzy input data, Cybernetics and Systems Analysis 34 (1998) 545–552. doi:10.1007/BF02666999. [39] A. Rotshtein, S. Shtovba, Fuzzy multicriteria analysis of variants with the use of paired comparisons, Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International 40 (2001) 499–503. [40] A. Rótshtein, S. Stovba, Managing a dynamic system by means of a fuzzy knowledge base, Automatic Control and Computer Sciences 35 (2001) 16–22. [41] A. Rotshtein, S. Shtovba, I. Mostav, Fuzzy rule based innovation projects estimation, volume 1, Vancouver, BC, 2001, pp. 122–126. [42] A. Rotshtejn, S. Shtovba, Influence of methods of defuzzification on speed of tuning the fuzzy model, Kibernetika i Sistemnyj Analiz (2002) 169–176. [43] A. Rotshtejn, S. Shtovba, Fuzzy rule based control of a dynamic system, Avtomatika i Vychislitel’naya Tekhnika (2001) 23–31. [44] A. Rotshteina, S. Shtovbab, Identification of a nonlinear dependence by a fuzzy knowledgebase in the case of a fuzzy training set, Cybernetics and Systems Analysis 42 (2006) 176–182. doi:10.1007/s10559-006-0051-1. [45] S. Shtovba, Fuzzy identification on the basis of regression models of parametric membership function, Journal of Automation and Information Sciences 38 (2006) 36–44. doi:10.1615/ JAutomatInfScien.v38.i11.40. [46] S. Shtovba, E. Shtovba, Prediction of competitive position of brand product by fuzzy knowledge base, Journal of Automation and Information Sciences 38 (2006) 69–80. doi:10. 1615/JAutomatInfScien.v38.i8.70. [47] S. Shtovba, Ensuring accuracy and transparency of Mamdani fuzzy model in learning by experimental data, Journal of Automation and Information Sciences 39 (2007) 39–52. doi:10.1615/JAutomatInfScien.v39.i8.50. [48] S. Shtovba, Fuzzy model tuning based on a training set with fuzzy model output values, Cybernetics and Systems Analysis 43 (2007) 334–340. doi:10.1007/s10559-007-0054-6. [49] A. Rotshtein, S. Shtovba, Modeling of the human operator reliability with the aid of the Sugeno fuzzy knowledge base, Automation and Remote Control 70 (2009) 163–169. doi:10.1134/S0005117909010123. [50] S. Shtovba, O. Pankevych, Fuzzy technology-based cause detection of structural cracks of stone buildings, volume 2105, CEUR-WS, 2018, pp. 209–218. [51] I. Khvostina, V. Oliinyk, S. Semerikov, V. Solovieva, V. Yatsenko, O. Kohut-Ferens, Hazards and risks in assessing the impact of oil and gas companies on the environment, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 628 (2021) 012027. doi:10.1088/ 1755-1315/628/1/012027. [52] S. V. Duplik, Model of adaptive testing on fuzzy mathematics, Computer science and education (2004) 57–65. [53] S. D. Danilova, Evaluation of test results in an adaptive automated testing system, Bulletin of VSSTU (2008) 12–20. [54] E. A. Belov, Development of a method and algorithms for testing knowledge based on intelligent processing of answers in natural language, Ph.D. thesis, Bryansk, 2006. [55] P. Nechypurenko, S. Semerikov, VlabEmbed - the new plugin Moodle for the chemistry education, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1844 (2017) 319–326. [56] I. A. Hameed, C. G. Sorensen, Fuzzy systems in education: A more reliable system for student evaluation, in: A. T. Azar (Ed.), Fuzzy Systems, IntechOpen, 2010, pp. 1–17. URL: https://www.intechopen.com/books/fuzzy-systems/ fuzzy-systems-in-education-a-more-reliable-system-for-student-evaluation. doi:10.5772/7216. | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The article describes the stages of modeling an intelligent system for evaluating multilevel test tasks based on fuzzy logic in the MATLAB application package, namely the Fuzzy Logic Toolbox. The analysis of existing approaches to fuzzy assessment of test methods, their advantages and disadvantages is given. The considered methods for assessing students are presented in the general case by two methods: using fuzzy sets and corresponding membership functions; fuzzy estimation method and generalized fuzzy estimation method. In the present work, the Sugeno production model is used as the closest to the natural language. This closeness allows for closer interaction with a subject area expert and build well-understood, easily interpreted inference systems. The structure of a fuzzy system, functions and mechanisms of model building are described. The system is presented in the form of a block diagram of fuzzy logical nodes and consists of four input variables, corresponding to the levels of knowledge assimilation and one initial one. The surface of the response of a fuzzy system reflects the dependence of the final grade on the level of difficulty of the task and the degree of correctness of the task. The structure and functions of the fuzzy system are indicated. The modeled in this way intelligent system for assessing multilevel test tasks based on fuzzy logic makes it possible to take into account the fuzzy characteristics of the test: the level of difficulty of the task, which can be assessed as “easy”, “average", “above average”, “difficult”; the degree of correctness of the task, which can be assessed as “correct”, “partially correct”, “rather correct”, “incorrect”; time allotted for the execution of a test task or test, which can be assessed as “short”, “medium”, “long”, “very long”; the percentage of correctly completed tasks, which can be assessed as “small”, “medium”, “large”, “very large”; the final mark for the test, which can be assessed as “poor”, “satisfactory”, “good”, “excellent”, which are included in the assessment. This approach ensures the maximum consideration of answers to questions of all levels of complexity by formulating a base of inference rules and selection of weighting coefficients when deriving the final estimate. The robustness of the system is achieved by using Gaussian membership functions. The testing of the controller on the test sample brings the functional suitability of the developed model. | uk |
| dc.language.iso | en | uk |
| dc.publisher | CEUR Workshop Proceedings | uk |
| dc.subject | intelligent system | uk |
| dc.subject | multilevel test tasks | uk |
| dc.subject | fuzzy test characteristics | uk |
| dc.subject | fuzzy assessment | uk |
| dc.subject | Sugeno inference system | uk |
| dc.title | Simulation of intellectual system for evaluation of multilevel test tasks on the basis of fuzzy logic | uk |
| dc.type | Article | uk |
| Розташовується у зібраннях: | Кафедра інформатики та прикладної математики | |
Файли цього матеріалу:
| Файл | Опис | Розмір | Формат | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| paper30.pdf | article | 1.37 MB | Adobe PDF | Переглянути/Відкрити |
Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.